Each of the following three criteria will be taken into account, in equal parts, by the jury:
- Did the presentation touch upon the relevance of the topic?
2. Comprehension and Content
- Did the presentation provide a clear understanding of the research question?
- Was the presentation clear and well-structured, and was it easy to follow?
- Was the language and terms used appropriate for a non-specialist audience?
- Does the presentation avoid scientific jargon and explain relevant terminology?
3. Engagement and Communication
- Did the presentation create interest or curiosity to know more about the topic?
- Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for her/his topic?
- Did the presenter capture and maintain the audience’s attention?
- Did the presentation offer a clear take-away to the listener?
External Jury Member
Sir Jonathan Faull
Chair, European Public Affairs of the Brunswick Group, formerly official in the European Commission
EUI Jury Members
Assistant Professor at the Department of Economics
Professor of Economics. Director of the Florence School of Regulation and Holder of the Loyola de Palacio Chair at the EUI Robert Schuman Centre
EUI Director of Communications
Professor of International Law and Human Rights and EUI Dean of Graduate Studies
Max Weber Fellow
Professor of Global and Colonial History
Professor in International Relations and Director of Graduate Studies